Performance of HCV Antigen Testing for the Diagnosis and Monitoring of Antiviral Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Active hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is based on the detection of HCV RNA that it is effective but presents high cost and the need to hire trained personnel. This systematic review and meta-analysis is aimed at evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of HCV Ag testing to identify HCV cases and to monitor antiviral treatment including DAA treatment. METHODS: The studies were identified through a search in PubMed, Lilacs, and Scopus from 1990 through March 31, 2020. Cohort, cross-sectional, and randomized controlled trials were included. Two independent reviewers extracted data and assessed quality using an adapted Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) tool. Our primary outcome was to determine the accuracy of HCV Ag detection for the diagnosis, which we estimated using random-effects meta-analysis. RESULTS: Of 3,062 articles identified, 54 met our eligibility criteria. The studies described cohorts from 20 countries, including 14,286 individuals with chronic HCV individuals. Studies for ECLIA technology demonstrated highest quality compared to studies that used ELISA. The pooled sensitivity and specificity (95% CI) for HCV Ag detection of active HCV infection were 98.82% (95%CI = 98.04%; 99.30%) and 98.95% (95%CI = 97.84%; 99.49%), respectively. High concordance was found between HCV Ag testing and HCV RNA detection 89.7% and 95% to evaluate antiviral treatment. CONCLUSIONS: According to our findings, HCV Ag testing could be useful to identify HCV active cases in low-resource areas. For antiviral treatment, HCV Ag testing will be useful at the end of treatment.

HCV core antigen plays an important role in the fight against HCV as an alternative to HCV-RNA detection.

OBJECTIVE: To discuss the clinical significance of HCV-cAg testing in the diagnosis, activity determination, and monitoring of therapeutic effectiveness of HCV infection and its advantages compared with HCV-RNA and anti-HCV antibodies detection. METHODS: By summarizing the published literature, the advantages and significance of HCV core antigen detection were sought. RESULTS: The expression of HCV-cAg is highly consistent with that of HCV-RNA, but compared with HCV-RNA, detection of HCV-cAg is easy to operate, time saving, and low cost. HCV-cAg can be detected within 12~15 days after infection, and the window period can be shortened by5~7 weeks. HCV-cAg is a serological indicator of virus replication, which can distinguish previous infection of HCV or current infection. HCV-cAg detection is more suitable for immunocompromised, hemodialysis, organ transplant patients. HCV-cAg also can be used to monitor antiviral efficacy and predict sustained virological response (SVR). CONCLUSION: HCV core antigen has similar clinical sensitivity to NAT and can be used as a substitute for HCV-RNA in the diagnosis of virus infection. Combined detection of HCV-cAg and antibody serology can help doctors detect HCV infection earlier, accurately diagnose different stages of HCV infection, and evaluate the therapeutic effect of antiviral drugs, which are beneficial in the prevention and treatment of hepatitis C.

Hepatitis C virus antigen detection is an appropriate test for screening and early diagnosis of hepatitis C virus infection in at-risk populations and immunocompromised hosts.

Early diagnosis remains key for effective prevention and treatment. Unfortunately, current screening with anti-hepatitis C virus antibody (anti-HCV Ab) test may have limited utility in the diagnosis of HCV infection and reinfection. This is of special concern to at-risk population, such as immunocompromised hosts and end-stage renal failure patients on hemodialysis. HCV antigen (Ag) could be useful in identifying the ongoing infection in such clinical scenarios. Hence, we aimed to study the utility of HCV Ag testing for the diagnosis of acute and chronic hepatitis C. Of 89 samples studied, 19 were from acute hepatitis C patients who were immunocompromised or were on hemodialysis, 43 were from active chronic hepatitis C patients and 27 were from patients treated for chronic hepatitis C. All samples were tested for HCV Ag using the Abbott ARCHITECT HCV Ag assay. HCV Ag was reactive in 19/19 samples from acute hepatitis C patients and 42/43 samples from active chronic hepatitis C patients. It was nonreactive in all samples from treated patients. The test showed a sensitivity and specificity of 98.4% and 100.0%, respectively. The positive and negative predictive values were 100.0% and 96.4%, respectively. The HCV antigen test has high clinical sensitivity and specificity and is useful for the diagnosis of acute and chronic hepatitis C infection in at-risk and immunocompromised patients. Its short turnaround time and relatively low cost are advantageous for use in patients on hemodialysis and other at-risk patients who require monitoring of HCV infection and reinfection.

Hepatitis C core antigen testing to diagnose active hepatitis C infection among haemodialysis patients.

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infects more than 71 million people worldwide and chronic HCV infection increases the risk of liver cirrhosis and failure. Haemodialysis (HD) is one of the renal replacement therapies with risk of HCV transmission. Anti-HCV antibodies are the serological screening test for HCV infection that does not detect active phase of infection. Majority HCV infected HD patients in Malaysia do not have further HCV RNA performed due to high cost and thus HCV treatment is less frequently offered. HCV Core Antigen (HCV Ag) can potentially be used to diagnose active HCV infection in HD population in comparison to HCV RNA, at lower cost. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study to assess the correlation between HCV Ag and HCV RNA and to identify the prevalence of active HCV infection among HCV seropositive HD patients from dialysis centres across West Malaysia from July 2019 to May 2020. Pre-dialysis blood was taken and tested for both HCV Ag and HCV RNA tests. HCV Ag was tested with Abbott ARCHITECT HCV Ag test. RESULTS: We recruited 112 seropositive HD patients from 17 centres with mean age of 54.04 ± 11.62 years, HD vintage of 14.1 ± 9.7 years, and male constitute 59.8% (67) of the study population. HCV Ag correlates well with HCV RNA (Spearman test coefficient 0.833, p < 0.001). The sensitivity was 90.7%, specificity 100%, positive predictive value (PPV) 100%, negative predictive value (NPV) 76.5%, and accuracy 92.9%. For HCV RNA level > 3000 IU/mL, HCV Ag had a higher sensitivity of 95.1% and greater correlation (Spearman test coefficient 0.897, p < 0.001). The prevalence of active HCV infection was 76.8% among HCV seropositive HD patients. CONCLUSIONS: Although HCV Ag is less sensitive, it shows an excellent correlation with HCV RNA and has 100% PPV. HCV Ag can be considered as an alternative diagnostic tool for chronic active HCV infection among HD cohort, who can then be considered for HCV treatment. For seropositive HD patient with negative HCV Ag, we recommend to follow-up with HCV RNA test.

Utility of grey zone testing strategy in transfusion transmissible infection testing in blood bank is of limited value!

Several blood banks use grey zone (GZ) phenomenon (defined as samples with optical density within 10% below the cut off in enzyme immuno-assay [EIA]/chemiluminescence immunoassay [CLIA]) to further augment blood safety. There is paucity of data regarding usefulness of GZ sample and its application in Transfusion Transmissible Infection (TTI) screening procedures in blood transfusion services. We looked at our GZ sample results and their confirmatory test results to verify if it adds to blood safety in our set-up? We performed a prospective analytical study on blood donors' samples over two years. All the donors' samples were screened for TTI using CLIA. Samples with signal/cut-off ratio between ≥0.90 and <1.00 were classified under GZ. They were re-tested in duplicate and submitted to confirmatory testing: Neutralization Test for HBsAg, Immunoblot for HCV, and Western blot for HIV. Among the 50,064 blood donors donating the blood during study period, 573 (1.14%) donors were reactive for HBsAg, HCV, and HIV. Forty-seven (0.1%) TTI samples were GZ, but none was "confirmed positive." The utility of GZ testing seems to be limited. However, this may be continued for sake of "erring on the side of caution" and since this only results in negligible wastage (0.1%) of blood units.

Current position of viral load versus hepatitis C core antigen testing. / Posición actual de la carga viral frente a la determinación de antígeno core del virus de la hepatitis C.

Quantification of hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA (viral load) is the most widely used marker to diagnose and confirm active HCV infection. The HCV core antigen forms part of the internal structure of the virus and, like HCV RNA, its detection also indicates viral replication and presents certain advantages over viral load testing such as its lower cost, the greater stability of the target, the possibility of working with the same primary tube as that used for HCV serology, and the rapidity of obtaining results, since there is no need to work in batches, unlike the situation with most viral load platforms. Although the core antigen has lower analytical sensitivity than HCV RNA for the detection of low viremia levels, several studies and guidelines have already shown their utility in the identification of patients with active HCV infection. This article summarises current platforms for viral load determination, including point-of-care systems, and also reviews the indications attributed to this marker by the main HCV treatment guidelines. The article also reviews the characteristics of HCV core antigen, the available platforms for its determination, its correlation with viral load determination, and the indications for this marker in the distinct guidelines.

Comparison of two immunoassays for concurrent detection of HCV antigen and antibodies among HIV/HCV co-infected patients in dried serum/plasma spots.

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) antigen/antibody (Ag/Ab) assays offer the benefit of reducing the window period compared to assays that detect only HCV-Ab. In this study the performance of the Murex Ag/Ab (Murex, Abbott) and Monolisa Ag/Ab Ultra (Monolisa, Bio-Rad) ELISAs was compared for the use of filter dried serum/plasma spots (DS/PS) with a focus on the sensitivity and the percentage of correct positive test results. Correct positive ELISA results were assumed for samples that subsequently tested positive for HCV RNA by RT-qPCR, or RNA negative samples that tested positive in a Western blot (confirmed ELISA results). Sensitivity was evaluated from DS/PS eluates using HCV seroconversion panels [plasma samples of subtypes-(St) 1a, 2b)] and longitudinal HCV antibody positive serum panels (St 1b, 2b, 3a, and 4d). The proportion of correct positive test results was evaluated using 1102 newly diagnosed HIV positive clinical dried serum spots (DSS) eluates for screening of potential HCV co-infection. For the plasma HCV seroconversion samples, which were used as a reference for DSS eluates, the Murex became reactive earlier for antigen positive bleeds. However, for the HCV antibody positive eluates and dilutions thereof, the Monolisa demonstrated a superior sensitivity. Of the clinical DSS 22.8 % (28/123) of samples reactive in the Murex were negative in a subsequent RT-qPCR and Western blot, while only 1.9 % (2/105) of the samples reactive in the Monolisa were negative in these confirmatory assays. Our results indicate that the Monolisa provides fewer false positive results for HCV detection in DSS, whereas for undiluted plasma or serum samples, the Murex can serve as an additional diagnostic tool to narrow the window period.

Hepatitis C virus core antigen is cost-effective in community-based screening of active hepatitis C infection in Taiwan.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) core antigen is highly sensitive and specific in viremic HCV diagnosis. This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of HCV core antigen (HCVcAg) in community-based screening for active HCV infection. METHODS: Between 2017/07 and 2018/07, community-based screenings for active HCV infection with two-step (anti-HCV for screening and HCVRNA for diagnosis) and one-step processes (HCVcAg for screening and diagnosis) were conducted in two districts in Kaohsiung City. While HCVcAg test was positive at ≥3 fmol/L, the lowest level of HCV-RNA detection was 12 IU/mL. We analyzed the cost-effectiveness of two algorithms in identifying active HCV infection. RESULTS: There were two large-scale screenings using the two-step process with a total of 2452 residents enrolled; while six hundred and forty-four residents participated in continuous small-scale screening with the one-step process. The prevalence of anti-HCV and positive HCVcAg was 3.4% and 2.8%. The viremic rate was 1.4% and 2.8% for two- and one-step processes (p < 0.001). While all positive HCVcAg were viremic, 42.4% of positive anti-HCV patients had viremia. The positive predictive value was 42.2% and 100% for two- and one-step processes in detecting active HCV infection (p < 0.001). In identifying one active HCV infection, the cost was $755.3 and $711.1 dollars for two- and one-step processes respectively. CONCLUSION: Compared to the two-step process in community-based screening, continuous screening with the HCVcAg test as a one-step tool for active HCV infection was cost-effective in areas with low seroprevalence of HCV in Taiwan.

Implications of grey zone results for routine hepatitis C virus screening with the ARCHITECT HCV-Ag assay.

AIMS: Hepatitis C virus antigen (HCV-Ag) detection requires retesting for samples with grey zone results (GzR), adding cost and time and decreasing reliability. Our aim in this study was to evaluate the frequency and significance of GzR during the use of the automated Architect HCV-Ag assay in routine clinical practice. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied HCV-Ag levels in 952 serum samples using the ARCHITECT HCV-Ag assay. GzR were detected in 33 samples; 25 were reactive on retesting and 19 were anti-HCV positive. Seventeen of these 19 samples were tested for HCV-RNA and were all reactive (viral loads <104  IU ml-1 ). The remaining six samples were anti-HCV nonreactive and had undetectable HCV-RNA. Eight GzR samples were nonreactive on retesting, seven were anti-HCV nonreactive (three underwent HCV-RNA quantification and were all nonreactive), and one was anti-HCV reactive (HCV-RNA nonreactive). No significant differences were found on comparing HCV-Ag values. CONCLUSIONS: Grey zone results found to be negative on retesting do not need additional technique testing, except in donor screening scenarios, where the use of molecular methods would be advisable. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY:  The proposed diagnostic algorithm confirms that, eventhough GzR occur, hepatitis C virus antigen is a robust alternative to HCV-RNA detection in the active detection of infections.

Early diagnosis and risk factors of acute hepatitis C in high-risk MSM on preexposure prophylaxis.

BACKGROUND: A high incidence of acute hepatitis C virus (HCV) (AHCV) infection has been reported among at-risk HIV-negative MSM. The optimal strategy for early diagnosis of AHCV in this population is not clearly defined. METHODS: In the ANRS IPERGAY PrEP trial, among high-risk HIV-negative MSM, HCV serology and serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) were used for screening at enrollment and during follow-up. Behavioral risk factors were compared at baseline between participants who were diagnosed with AHCV during the study compared with those who did not. In participants with a positive HCV serology, we used stored sera to perform the following tests at diagnosis and on previous visits: HCV-antibodies rapid tests, plasma HCV viral load and HCV antigen immunoassay. We evaluated the sensitivity of each test for AHCV diagnosis. RESULTS: Among 429 enrolled participants, 14 were diagnosed with AHCV infection, with a median follow-up of 2.1 (interquartile range, 1.5-2.8) years. AHCV incidence was 1.40 per 100 person-years (95% confidence interval, 0.74-2.39). Patients with AHCV reported a significantly higher number of sexual acts and/or partners, and more frequent recreational drug use at baseline. At the prior visit before AHCV diagnosis (median of 2 months earlier), sensitivities of HCV RNA and HCV antigen tests were, respectively, 100 and 89%, whereas none of the patients had a positive serology, and only 25% had elevated ALT. CONCLUSION: HCV antigen and RNA tests were positive within a median of 2 months before the detection of antibodies and ALT elevation. These tests could be considered for HCV screening in high-risk MSM.

Hepatitis C virus core antigen as a possible alternative for evaluation of treatment effectiveness after treatment with direct-acting antivirals.

Background: Chronic hepatitis C is a major public health problem around the world. In monitoring treatment efficacy, although costly and labour-intensive methods of molecular biology are often used, much cheaper and technically easier serological methods evaluating the concentration of HCV core antigen in serum are available. We evaluated HCVcAg quantification as a possible assessment of the treatment efficacy instead of HCV RNA quantification.Methods: We collected 514 serum samples from treated HCV infected patients. Quantitative evaluation of HCV RNA and HCVcAg was carried out before treatment, at the end of treatment, and at least 12 weeks following treatment termination. HCV RNA was determined by automated assay (Roche COBAS) and HCVcAg quantitation with ARCHITECT ci8200 analyser.Results: There was a significant correlation between HCVcAg and HCV RNA concentrations at baseline and follow-up visits, but not at the end of treatment. Among samples collected before the treatment, at the end of treatment and follow-up visit, concordance of HCV RNA and HCVcAg reached level of 98.1%, 98.9% and 98.7%, respectively. Diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of HCVcAg detection were >97%.Conclusions: HCVcAg measurement could be an alternative for determining HCV treatment efficacy after chemotherapy and could be an option in the diagnosis of HCV infection.

Community screening for hepatitis C virus infection in a low-prevalence population.

BACKGROUND: Age cohort screening for hepatitis C virus (HCV) might be an effective strategy if the majority of undiagnosed cases are concentrated in a particular age group. The objective of this study was to determine HCV prevalence in different age cohorts of the general population in the Central European part of Russia and second, to assess feasibility of HCV antigen testing for community screening programs. METHODS: Sera from 2027 volunteers were tested for anti-HCV (Architect Anti-HCV, Abbott Laboratories). All anti-HCV reactive samples were confirmed in an immunoblot and tested for HCV Ag (ARCHITECT HCV Ag, Abbott Laboratories), HCV RNA and HCV viral load. RESULTS: Out of 31 individuals with anti-HCV reactive result, 22 (71%) were confirmed by immunoblot, six were false positives and three were indeterminate. Active infection was observed in 73% of anti-HCV confirmed positives. Five out of 16 individuals had low HCV-RNA levels (< 10,000 IU/mL) and one of those had a very low level (594 IU/mL). Agreement between HCV Ag and HCV RNA was 100%. Total anti-HCV and active HCV infection rates were 1.09% (22/2027) and 0.79% (16/2027), respectively. The peak rates were observed in people 60 years or older (anti-HCV: 2.84% [95% CI: 1.66-4.74%], 13/319; HCV RNA/HCV Ag: 2.23% [95% CI: 1.20-4.00%], 10/319). CONCLUSIONS: Overall HCV prevalence is low, except in people 60 years or older. The latter should be considered as a target group for HCV screening. The high agreement between HCV RNA and HCV Ag suggests the utility of HCV Ag testing to confirm active infection in screening programs.

Evaluation of a hepatitis C virus core antigen assay from venepuncture and dried blood spot collected samples: A cohort study.

The global scale-up of hepatitis C virus (HCV) diagnosis requires simplified and affordable HCV diagnostic pathways. This study evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of the HCV Architect core antigen (HCVcAg) assay for detection of active HCV infection in plasma and capillary whole blood dried blood spots (DBS) compared with HCV RNA testing in plasma (Abbott RealTime HCV Viral Load). Samples were collected from participants in an observational cohort enrolled at three sites in Australia (two-drug treatment and alcohol clinics and one homelessness service). Of 205 participants, 200 had results across all samples and assay types and 186 were included in this analysis (14 participants receiving HCV therapy were excluded). HCV RNA was detected in 29% of participants ([95% CI: 22.6-36.1], 54 of 186). The sensitivity of HCVcAg for detection of active HCV infection in plasma was 98.1% (95% CI: 90-100) and 100% (95% CI: 93-100) when compared to HCV RNA thresholds of ≥12 and ≥1000 IU/mL, respectively. The sensitivity of the HCVcAg assay for detection of active HCV infection in DBS was 90.7% (95% CI: 80-97) and 92.5% (95% CI: 82-98) when compared to HCV RNA thresholds of ≥12 and ≥1000 IU/mL, respectively. The specificity of HCV core antigen for detection of active infection was 100% (95% CI: 97-100) for all samples and RNA thresholds. These data indicate that the detection of HCVcAg is a useful tool for determining active HCV infection; to facilitate enhanced testing, linkage to care and treatment particularly when testing plasma samples are collected by venepuncture.

Estimation of hepatitis C prevalence in the Punjab province of Pakistan: A retrospective study on general population.

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections are amongst the leading public health concerns in Pakistan with a high disease burden. Despite the availability of effective antiviral treatments in the country the disease burden in general population has not lowered. This could be attributed to the asymptomatic nature of this infection that results in lack of diagnosis until the late symptomatic stage. To better estimate and map HCV infections in the country a population-based analysis is necessary for an effective control of the infection. METHODS: Serologic samples of ~66,000 participants from all major cities of the Punjab province were tested for anti-HCV antibodies. The antibody-based seroprevalence was associated with socio-demographic variables including geographical region, age, gender and sex, and occupation. RESULTS: Overall serological response to HCV surface antigens was observed in over 17% of the population. Two of the districts were identified with significantly high prevalence in general population. Analysis by occupation showed significantly high prevalence in farmers (over 40%) followed by jobless and retired individuals, laborers and transporters. A significant difference in seroprevalence was observed in different age groups amongst sex and genders (male, female and transgender) with highest response in individuals of over 40 years of age. Moreover, most of the tested IDUs showed positive response for anti-HCV antibody. CONCLUSION: This study represents a retrospective analysis of HCV infections in general population of the most populated province of Pakistan to identify socio-demographic groups at higher risk. Two geographical regions, Faisalabad and Okara districts, and an occupational group, farmers, were identified with significantly high HCV seroprevalence. These socio-demographic groups are the potential focused groups for follow-up studies on factors contributing to the high HCV prevalence in these groups towards orchestrating effective prevention, control and treatment.

HCV core antigen is a useful predictor during pegylated-interferon/ribavirin therapy in patients with hepatitis C virus genotype 1b.

Enzyme immunoassays for quantifying hepatitis C virus (HCV) core antigen (Ag) have been proposed as an alternative to HCV RNA detection. The present study aimed to investigate the early kinetics of serum HCVcAg and its usefulness in predicting virological responses.The clinical data of 135 patients with chronic hepatitis C treated with pegylated interferon alpha (PEG-IFN-α) and ribavirin was retrospectively collected. The patients were grouped according to their treatment outcomes as follows: sustained virological response (SVR), nonsustained virological response (N-SVR), and relapse.Higher HCVcAg and HCV RNA levels were observed in patients in the N-SVR group than in the other groups at baseline. HCVcAg better predicted rapid virological response (RVR) compared with HCV RNA and had a predictive value similar to that of HCV RNA for SVR and early virological response. In the relapse group, HCV RNA decreased to 0 after 48 weeks, whereas HCVcAg was still detectable, indicating that HCVcAg more sensitively predicted relapse in antiviral therapy than HCV RNA.For patients treated with PEG-INF-α and ribavirin, HCVcAg may more sensitively predict relapse than HCV RNA.

IgG1 and IgG4 antibodies against Core and NS3 antigens of hepatitis C virus.

INTRODUCTION: IgG subclasses involved in the immune response to hepatitis C virus (HCV) antigens have been rarely studied. We investigated the immune response mediated by IgG1 and IgG4 antibodies against the recombinant core and NS3 antigens in patients with chronic hepatitis C. METHODS: Sixty patients infected with HCV genotype 1 without antiviral treatment and 60 healthy subjects participated in the study. Serum levels of alanine aminotransferase, HCV viremia, and the presence of cryoglobulinemia and liver fibrosis were determined. We investigated the serum IgG1 and IgG4 antibodies against recombinant HCV core and NS3 non-structural protein antigens using amplified indirect ELISA. RESULTS: Anti-core and anti-NS3 IgG1 antibodies were detected in 33/60 (55%) and 46/60 (77%) patients, respectively, whereas only two healthy control samples reacted with an antigen (NS3). Anti-core IgG4 antibodies were not detected in either group, while 30/60 (50%) patients had anti-NS3 IgG4 antibodies. Even though there were higher levels of anti-NS3 IgG4 antibodies in patients with low viremia (< 8 × 105 IU/mL), IgG1 and IgG4 antibody levels did not correlate with ALT levels, the presence of cryoglobulinemia, or degree of hepatic fibrosis. High production of anti-core and anti-NS3 IgG1 antibodies was observed in chronic hepatitis C patients. In contrast, IgG4 antibodies seemed to only be produced against the NS3 non-structural antigen and appeared to be involved in viremia control. CONCLUSIONS: IgG1 antibodies against structural and non-structural antigens can be detected in chronic hepatitis C, while IgG4 antibodies seem to be selectively stimulated by non-structural HCV proteins, such as the NS3 antigen.

'HepCheck Dublin': an intensified hepatitis C screening programme in a homeless population demonstrates the need for alternative models of care.

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is one of the main causes of chronic liver disease worldwide. Prevalence of HCV in homeless populations ranges from 3.9 to 36.2%. The HepCheck study sought to investigate and establish the characterisation of HCV burden among individuals who attended an intensified screening programme for HCV in homeless services in Dublin, Ireland. METHODS: The HepCheck study was conducted as part of a larger European wide initiative called HepCare Europe. The study consisted of three phases; 1) all subjects completed a short survey and were offered a rapid oral HCV test; 2) a convenience sample of HCV positive participants from phase 1 were selected to complete a survey on health and social risk factors and 3) subjects were tracked along the referral pathway to identify whether they were referred to a specialist clinic, attended the specialist clinic, were assessed for cirrhosis by transient elastography (Fibroscan) and were treated for HCV. RESULTS: Five hundred ninety-seven individuals were offered HCV screening, 73% were male and 63% reported having had a previous HCV screening. We screened 538 (90%) of those offered screening, with 37% testing positive. Among those who tested positive, 112 (56%) were 'new positives' and 44% were 'known positives'. Undiagnosed HCV was prevalent in 19% of the study sample. Active past 30-day drug use was common, along with attendance for drug treatment. Unstable accommodation was the most common barrier to attending specialist appointments and accessing treatment. Depression and anxiety, dental problems and respiratory conditions were common reported health problems. Forty-six subjects were referred to specialised services and two subjects completed HCV treatment. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that the current hospital-based model of care is inadequate in addressing the specific needs of a homeless population and emphasises the need for a community-based treatment approach. Findings are intended to inform HepCare Europe in their development of a community-based model of care in order to engage with homeless individuals with multiple co-morbidities including substance abuse, who are affected by or infected with HCV.

Screening haemodialysis patients for hepatitis C in Vietnam: The inconsistency between common hepatitis C virus serological and virological tests.

Selecting the appropriate screening method and interval for the early detection of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in low-resourced haemodialysis settings is a challenge. The challenge occurs when patients are classified as HCV-RNA positive but negative to HCV-core antigen (HCV-coreAg), anti-HCV and genotyping tests. We aim to clarify the inconsistency between HCV-RNA, HCV-coreAg, anti-HCV and HCV genotyping tests in haemodialysis patients and determine the reliability of HCV-coreAg as a routine two-monthly screening strategy. Haemodialysis patients were tested every 2 months between 2012 and 2014 at the largest district haemodialysis unit in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, for aminotransferases, anti-HCV antibodies, HCV-coreAg, HCV-RNA and HCV genotype. HCV-coreAg and anti-HCV results were tested against HCV-RNA for sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV). All 201 patients participated in the study. The HCV-coreAg test performed better than the anti-HCV test for sensitivity (100% vs 31%), NPV (100% vs 90%) and accuracy (100% vs 90%). The HCV-coreAg and anti-HCV tests performed no differently for specificity (100% and 98%, respectively) or PPV (100% and 73%, respectively). Kappa values for HCV-coreAg and anti-HCV tests were 1 and 0.39, respectively. Early detection of HCV for the purpose of infection prevention requires a high level of sensitivity and HCV-coreAg performed better in our chronic haemodialysis population as a two-monthly screening method than routine anti-HCV testing. HCV-coreAg test is less labour-intensive with a higher level of accuracy in patients with low viral loads making it cost effective for low-resourced settings. Repeating genotyping may be required in HCV-coreAg positive patients with a low viral load.

IgG1 and IgG4 antibodies against core and NS3 antigens of hepatitis C virus

Abstract INTRODUCTION: IgG subclasses involved in the immune response to hepatitis C virus (HCV) antigens have been rarely studied. We investigated the immune response mediated by IgG1 and IgG4 antibodies against the recombinant core and NS3 antigens in patients with chronic hepatitis C. METHODS: Sixty patients infected with HCV genotype 1 without antiviral treatment and 60 healthy subjects participated in the study. Serum levels of alanine aminotransferase, HCV viremia, and the presence of cryoglobulinemia and liver fibrosis were determined. We investigated the serum IgG1 and IgG4 antibodies against recombinant HCV core and NS3 non-structural protein antigens using amplified indirect ELISA. RESULTS: Anti-core and anti-NS3 IgG1 antibodies were detected in 33/60 (55%) and 46/60 (77%) patients, respectively, whereas only two healthy control samples reacted with an antigen (NS3). Anti-core IgG4 antibodies were not detected in either group, while 30/60 (50%) patients had anti-NS3 IgG4 antibodies. Even though there were higher levels of anti-NS3 IgG4 antibodies in patients with low viremia (< 8 × 105 IU/mL), IgG1 and IgG4 antibody levels did not correlate with ALT levels, the presence of cryoglobulinemia, or degree of hepatic fibrosis. High production of anti-core and anti-NS3 IgG1 antibodies was observed in chronic hepatitis C patients. In contrast, IgG4 antibodies seemed to only be produced against the NS3 non-structural antigen and appeared to be involved in viremia control. CONCLUSIONS: IgG1 antibodies against structural and non-structural antigens can be detected in chronic hepatitis C, while IgG4 antibodies seem to be selectively stimulated by non-structural HCV proteins, such as the NS3 antigen.